Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 8/23/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
d31phin is probably not a name end users are going to be familiar with.
Why not just include the patches from the fork and retain the same name?
It is unlikely that dolphin or its fork for KDE 3 is going to get many
releases.
We could use "Provides: dolphin" .
However I have rpms from both methods ready. Which one you would recommend?
Like I said, this is likely a short lived branch and if there is just a
bunch of useful patches that fixes bugs, adding them to the existing
package will be less work for you but now that you have already done the
packaging, you could go either way.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
