Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> We could use "Provides: dolphin" .
>
> However I have rpms from both methods ready. Which one you would
> recommend? Meanwhile mine will be :
>
> submitting a new review for d3lphin and EOL'ing dolphin.
> Provides: dolphin
> Obsoletes: dolphin <= 0.8.2
Using an unversioned Provides is usually not a good idea. As long as
d3lphin's version is higher than 0.8.2, probably best to simply use:
Provides: dolphin = %{version}-%{release}
And, while Rahul's sentiments about naming have an appeal, you really ought
to follow upstream naming (and use d3lphin).
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
