On 8/23/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > d31phin is probably not a name end users are going to be familiar with. > Why not just include the patches from the fork and retain the same name? > It is unlikely that dolphin or its fork for KDE 3 is going to get many > releases. We could use "Provides: dolphin" . However I have rpms from both methods ready. Which one you would recommend? Meanwhile mine will be : submitting a new review for d3lphin and EOL'ing dolphin. Provides: dolphin Obsoletes: dolphin <= 0.8.2 Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
