Eric Sandeen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
David Chambers wrote:
Can't comment on SELinux, don't use it :-) :-)
It doesn't matter whether you use it or not. SELinux support is
important to this project and filesystem is a critical piece. If anyone
is volunteering to support whatever features Fedora needs, test it and
keep it updated, that's when XFS can be considered for being available
for default.
I'm already getting xfs bugs & xfsprogs bugs from fedora - some I fix,
some I pass on to sgi, some are still unfixed - IOW, about like any
other fedora subsystem. ;)
I'd be happy to continue to look after xfs & userspace as well as I can
(given various time constraints) for fedora, and I'm sure the sgi guys
will offer backup support as they have been already.
Excellent!
David - Since Eric has been kind enough to step forward and fill this
role, can we expect to see XFS in the next test release, then? I would
assume it would be too late to get it into test1...
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Yocum
Fermilab 630.840.6509
yocum@xxxxxxxx, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov
Fermilab. Just zeros and ones.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
