On 7/26/2007 4:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:32:30 -0500 > Dan Yocum <yocum@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> It's stable, widely tested, widely deployed, and >> it's being actively developed and maintained (which is more than can >> be said of some other filesystems that remain in the default list). >> It's in the kernel, it shouldn't be "hidden" in the depths of >> anaconda anymore. >> > > How's the SELinux support these days? And why can't I boot from xfs > yet? > > Back in the old Red Hat Linux and FC2-4 days when I had more time, I seem to remember that Grub fully supported XFS. I could make all the filesystems XFS and I could boot just fine from them. Nowadays, I have less time, or I'm lazy, and just accept the Anaconda ext3 defaults for the system partitions. I still store all the important user data under XFS, though. I haven't lost a byte to XFS yet. Can't comment on SELinux, don't use it :-) :-) I agree with Dan. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
