Rahul Sundaram wrote: > David Chambers wrote: > >> Can't comment on SELinux, don't use it :-) :-) > > It doesn't matter whether you use it or not. SELinux support is > important to this project and filesystem is a critical piece. If anyone > is volunteering to support whatever features Fedora needs, test it and > keep it updated, that's when XFS can be considered for being available > for default. I'm already getting xfs bugs & xfsprogs bugs from fedora - some I fix, some I pass on to sgi, some are still unfixed - IOW, about like any other fedora subsystem. ;) I'd be happy to continue to look after xfs & userspace as well as I can (given various time constraints) for fedora, and I'm sure the sgi guys will offer backup support as they have been already. -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list