On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 14:27 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > Peter Vrabec wrote: > >> I'd say that since sysklogd is erased, rsylogd should be automatically > >> enabled and started. Yes, I know the packaging recommendations, but I > >> think that in this case an exception should be accepted. > > > > I agree, but I don't know any nice and secure way we can do it. > shipping an /etc/init.d/rsyslog with default options set to enabled + > service rsyslog start in %post is not OK ? Starting a service in %post is not in at all okay. It can cause all sorts of havoc when installing systems, creating live images, init'ing chroots for building in, ... Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
