On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 17:47 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:21:38AM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > I was tentatively planning on having FESCo decide this around the end of > > July / beginning of August, since we need still need input from the tool > > team as to whether the tool-chain warrants a mass-rebuild for F8. > > But one of the questions is whether mass rebuilds need to be done > irrespective of that input. Not that the team is not compentent, but > we had the same input for F7 and found it not proper at several > instances already and bridge-utils is still compiled against 2.6.18 > headers (just an example). > > So the top question is: Always have mass rebuilds, no matter what, or > delegate this decision to a releng/tools team? That question is actually the item I have on the schedule to discuss (which like said I was planning on doing around the end of July). It's the first item in the priority 2 section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/Schedule Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
