On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 19:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I would appreciate if FESCo or anyone interested look at and commented > about the suitability of this as I requested earlier. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00308.html > > During Fedora 7 time frame the FESCo decision to not to rebuilds was > just for the release in part because it was late during the release > cycle and the decision whether we wanted to do rebuilds every cycle or > not going further was not supposed to be happening earlier this time. > Just a reminder again. I was tentatively planning on having FESCo decide this around the end of July / beginning of August, since we need still need input from the tool team as to whether the tool-chain warrants a mass-rebuild for F8. > Also in fedora-maintainers I posted a mail about wiki naming long back > and as FESCo using the Extras name space for posting the meeting minutes > or agenda isn't suitable anymore, it has to decide and move it to a new > location. I agree with you that we need to move the lingering items on the wiki away from the Extras name space, but that's been a fairly low-priority item right now. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
