On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:21:38AM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 19:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > I would appreciate if FESCo or anyone interested look at and commented > > about the suitability of this as I requested earlier. > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00308.html > > > > During Fedora 7 time frame the FESCo decision to not to rebuilds was > > just for the release in part because it was late during the release > > cycle and the decision whether we wanted to do rebuilds every cycle or > > not going further was not supposed to be happening earlier this time. > > Just a reminder again. > > I was tentatively planning on having FESCo decide this around the end of > July / beginning of August, since we need still need input from the tool > team as to whether the tool-chain warrants a mass-rebuild for F8. But one of the questions is whether mass rebuilds need to be done irrespective of that input. Not that the team is not compentent, but we had the same input for F7 and found it not proper at several instances already and bridge-utils is still compiled against 2.6.18 headers (just an example). So the top question is: Always have mass rebuilds, no matter what, or delegate this decision to a releng/tools team? The more you wait for the decision the more it will become a moot point as there will be no time to do rebuilds. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpJ3wEvK7TOO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
