Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:47:44AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> This is also another case where Fedora may be the first to "incur the pain" of 
> reworking our software for Xulrunner, and identifying things that need to be 
> change, potentially upstream.  We need to be more proactive about touting 
> these things where we break ground and other distros just follow us through.  
> We often are the suckers who take all the pain and punishment, the other 
> distros just follow us through and say "look at how much better ours is!"

Maybe not this time.  Xulrunner has bee in gentoo for a little while
now and is getting more and more generalized.  So hopefully the worst
is already behind.

  OG.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux