On 6/28/07, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is not a big enough change to warrant that IMO though. It won't be any more newsworthy than any other firefox release.
Every firefox release is newsworthy, don't be so modest. How many applications do firefox security updates end up breaking through library dependencies? End-users definitely notice when a firefox updates go out.... its always big news. More seriously, the above quoted text gets to the heart of the problem with a 'features' documentation policy. At the end of the day, the group of people who define something as feature-worthy are going to need to be the ones who keep the feature-level text updated. If a maintainer doesn't 'see' this as feature worthy then expecting the maintainer to keep that additional text updated will cause some friction. Personally I disagree with you about xulrunner. Several application packages which currently depend on libraries inside firefox are going to be positively impacted by the inclusion of xulrunner. Enough of them to make xulrunner a big enough deal to make a little fuss over in the next fedora release from an end-user perspective. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
