Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I was not aware that in writing things down on the wiki was a 
> >>>>> requisite for work to get done... 
> >>>> This is sort of a anticipated response but writing things down on the 
> >>>> wiki *is part* of getting the work done.  See
> >>>>
> >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft
> >>> Thankfully, that's still a draft, or I'd have to edit the wiki page that 
> >>> I was about to send you a reply... :-)
> >> It is waiting on FESCo ratification on the meeting tomorrow.
> > 
> > It doesn't make much sense to ratify such policies without asking for
> > feedback from the people who are subject to it first, if you ask me.
> 
> Feedback was asked right in this list. Check the archives.

I see that John asked for feedback 2 days ago, I don't see a single
reponse to that - do you really think that is sufficient discussion to
ratify this tomorrow ?!

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux