Re: XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:58 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:29 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 22:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > >>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >>>> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I was not aware that in writing things down on the wiki was a 
> > >>>>> requisite for work to get done... 
> > >>>> This is sort of a anticipated response but writing things down on the 
> > >>>> wiki *is part* of getting the work done.  See
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/FeaturePolicyDraft
> > >>> Thankfully, that's still a draft, or I'd have to edit the wiki page that 
> > >>> I was about to send you a reply... :-)
> > >> It is waiting on FESCo ratification on the meeting tomorrow.
> > > 
> > > It doesn't make much sense to ratify such policies without asking for
> > > feedback from the people who are subject to it first, if you ask me.
> > 
> > Feedback was asked right in this list. Check the archives.
> 
> I see that John asked for feedback 2 days ago, I don't see a single
> reponse to that - do you really think that is sufficient discussion to
> ratify this tomorrow ?!

No.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux