On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:18:39AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:04:04AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:23:49PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > Requiring yelp only because an app ships a yelp file is like requiring > > > > evince for shipping pdf docu or firefox for shipping html docu. > > > > > > Similarly, if a program calls evince or htmlviewer when clicking on a > > > button, then it should considered to add it as a Requires. > > > > So what about FF? Would you suggest that it should require evince? > > I am not completly understanding your point. FF is firefox, right? Why > should it require evince? Because if you click on a pdf file it will try to run it. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp5js4fellsA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
