On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:04:04AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:23:49PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > Requiring yelp only because an app ships a yelp file is like requiring > > > evince for shipping pdf docu or firefox for shipping html docu. > > > > Similarly, if a program calls evince or htmlviewer when clicking on a > > button, then it should considered to add it as a Requires. > > So what about FF? Would you suggest that it should require evince? I am not completly understanding your point. FF is firefox, right? Why should it require evince? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list