On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 02:10:10PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > @Christopher: I have this scenario (taken out of bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242673) -- > user removes firefox from his system (for example, because he > wants to install firefox.i386 instead of firefox.x86_64). Yum > dutifuly notes, that depending package yelp will be also removed. Doesn't this remind a bit like the ten year old "Windows needs Explorer" issues, only now "Fedora needs Firefox"? Maybe firefox should be split into libs and non-libs? yelp only needs libgtkembedmoz.so, libxpcom.so, libxpcom_core.so and gecko-libs, not firefox itself. Requiring yelp only because an app ships a yelp file is like requiring evince for shipping pdf docu or firefox for shipping html docu. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp9qZTxT9TpN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
