Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
dnsmasq is specifically designed for this purpose, and in fact upstream
has added dbus support to it specifically so it can integrate nicely
with NetworkManager. Why we're not using it, I don't know.
NM doesn't actually use caching-nameserver at the moment.
Bill
I'm not sure why NM doesn't use it (If could remember correctly, NM used
it). NM + dhcdbd + named could be good solution for save bandwidth.
Adam
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
