Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 09:05 -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > > By the way, I always wanted to ask... we use caching-nameserver > > because the libc resolver can only do per-process caching versus > > system-wide caching, right? > > > > If so, wouldn't nscd be a lighter weight daemon for this purpose? > > dnsmasq is specifically designed for this purpose, and in fact upstream > has added dbus support to it specifically so it can integrate nicely > with NetworkManager. Why we're not using it, I don't know. NM doesn't actually use caching-nameserver at the moment. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
