Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes: > > Anybody else think we're issuing entirely /way/ too many updates? We've had > 138 "stable" updates, and 177 current "testing" updates. If all those were > to go stable, we're talking over 300 updates, in just over a week. Maybe some of those updates aren't really updates, but packages that didn't make it into F7 final because there was no way to label them as such by maintainers? I have one such package in updates-testing right now. > Seriously. We're drowning our users in updates. Are all of them really > necessary? I feel like we've got this culture of update whatever/whenever > coming from Extras where it was just fire and forget. While that might be > fun for the maintainer, is it fun for the user? Personally, I'm a new software junkie, so I don't mind at all as a user. > Is it fun for the user with > a slow connection? That may be a real problem. Not sure how many people fall in that category though. Maybe smolt could also have the "available bandwidth" statistics... -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
