Re: The updates firehose

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 09 Jun 2007 19:56:53 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> 1) New packages.
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?r1=1.2922&r2=1.3050
Should be a decent indication
>> 2) Updates to packages that, frankly, almost nobody has installed.
> 
> I wish we had quantifiable numbers to go along with this to aid
> discussion.  If a large majority of the updates really are new
> packages or niche package updates then i doubt there's much of a
> concern from a userbase pov. But we don't have hard numbers for either
> 1 or 2.
> 
> -jef"If wishes were horses we'd all be eating steak--name the tv show
> this quote is from"spaleta
Firefly?

N.J.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux