Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
Are you suggesting to use the target triple as the rpm arch name? Isn't gcc-4.1.2-12.armv5l-softvfp-linux-gnueabi.rpm kind of long?
Yes, it's much too long, but it is a starting point should Fedora deem armv5l-softvfp-linux-gnueabi an important variant :-)
(Note that our package repo uses eabi, where vfp byte/word order and softfloat are the default, so we don't encode those bits of info explicitly. The packages use 'armv5tel' as the rpm arch name.)
I like armv5l and armv5b arch names, but this seems like a relatively minor point.
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
