On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 09:16 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 07:31 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> >> Manas Saksena wrote:
> >>> Andy Green wrote:
> >>>> Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> >>>> I have rpm-packaged a bunch of apps for crosscompile (arm9 and avr32)
> >>>> here
> >>> Did you have to modify rpm/rpmbuild tools? Virtually, every Embedded
> >>> Linux vendor has modified rpm to make it behave properly for
> >>> cross-building etc. It would be a good idea if we can get this done
> >>> right in upstream rpm.
> >> No, nothing was needed to change in the build host rpmbuild, it works
> >> fine with rpmbuild that comes from FC6 and FC7 as it is including using
> >> rpmbuild --target to set the arch. The spec files are just normal spec
> >> files.
> > This doesn't match at all with my experience.
> >
> > But .. could it be that you are not having redhat-rpm-config installed?
> > At least on FC6 it screws up --target, produces invalid *debuginfo*.rpm
> > for foreign object formats and many other details.
>
> No it's installed, but --target works...
Sorry, it can't work, I am sure, because many details causing breakage
are hard-coded into redhat-rpm-config. Not even building cross-compilers
works correctly because redhat-rpm-config breaks things.
(Cf. avr-binutils's and avr-gcc's specs in Fedora).
> well it works as far as setting
> %{_target_cpu} goes which is pretty much all I ask of it. Note you seem
> to need to give an arch-dist-os triplet like this
> $ rpmbuild -ba --target=arm-octotux-linux mISDNuser-1.2.0.spec
> Building target platforms: arm-octotux-linux
> Building for target arm-octotux-linux
> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76322
> ...
> + make CROSS=/opt/arm/bin/arm-linux- MISDNDIR=../mISDN-1.2.0
> 'CFLAGS=-I/projects/octotux/packages/rpm/devel-filesystem-arm/usr/include
> -I/projects/octotux/packages/rpm/BUILD/mISDNuser-1.2.0/include
> -I/opt/arm/include -O3' CC=gcc
> LDFLAGS=-L/projects/octotux/packages/rpm/devel-filesystem-arm/usr/lib
> ...
And what is being produced? An *.i386.rpm or an *.arm.rpm?
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
