On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Andy Green wrote:
And what is being produced? An *.i386.rpm or an *.arm.rpm?
...
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/projects/octotux/packages/rpm/BUILD/mISDNuser-arm-root
Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/SRPMS/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.src.rpm
Wrote: /projects/octotux/packages/rpm/RPMS/arm/mISDNuser-1.2.0-163.arm.rpm
.arm.rpm?
If we have i386, i686 etc, shouldn't it rather be .armv5.rpm, .armv6.rpm
etc, or actually your current -march flag like in my current
-march=armv5te?
.arm.rpm would be OK once the ARM EABI is employed in latter GCC versions
I guess, or?
Linus
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
