Linus Walleij wrote: > If we have i386, i686 etc, shouldn't it rather be .armv5.rpm, .armv6.rpm > etc, or actually your current -march flag like in my current > -march=armv5te? > > .arm.rpm would be OK once the ARM EABI is employed in latter GCC > versions I guess, or? No you're right. It ultimately comes from my cross toolchain having names like arm-linux-gcc, I am sure any Fedora implementation would make a smarter choice as you suggest. -Andy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
