On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 15:09 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "DW" == David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > DW> Can I submit a 'regular CVS admin request' for removing all the > DW> pkg.acl files from all packages? > > Well, you could submit it. I certainly wouldn't act on it, mainly > because I just got the necessary access and don't really want to lose > it so soon. But I don't disagree with the general sentiment. If this is desired, we should start a simple wiki page that package maintainers can add requests to for their packages. I don't want to bulk handle anything without the maintainers' input. Start a page, allow 2 weeks for entries, then do the changes. > > DW> If we want to foster teamwork, then _defaulting_ to a completely > DW> closed policy is a very poor choice. > > Well, see the logs from the most recent FESCO meeting. This is what > we were complaining about. Some solutions were proposed, and I hope > to see something happen soon. Personally I'd prefer to require people > who want an ACL to say so in the CVS request; otherwise the package > doesn't get one. We should revisit that again soon. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list