On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 13:44 -0500, David G. Mackay wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 18:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > It's got very little to do with upstream. The problem is that there is > > no _Fedora_ maintainer with enough time and energy to make the package > > work as part of _Fedora_. > > I have asked several times what leads to the expectation that a package > that has been the primary package for FC6 and generated only 12 bugzilla > entries during that time would suddenly become a massive problem. I can > understand that care would need to be taken to prevent unintended > interactions between 2.4 and 2.5, but that's doable. More specifically, > we've discussed the option of putting it under the zope directory > hierarchy. Someone would have to actively dig to find it and use it out > of context if that were the case. Yes. Again, someone would have to do the work. Who's volunteering to start? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
