Denis Leroy schrieb: > Michael Stahnke wrote: >> On 5/5/07, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sa Mai 5 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> How many kenrel 2.4 releases has there been since kernel 2.6 came >>> out? Why >>>> should anybody support kernel 2.6 if kernel 2.4 releases are still >>>> happening? >>> Afaik it is not possible to use 2.4 and 2.6 kernels at the same time, >>> but with >>> python there seem to be no technical problems, so these two issues are >>> not >>> really comparable. >> Doens't slackware ship a 2.4 kernel and a 2.6 kernel in their release? >> Also, I think this only cements the feeling that Fedora is for >> developers, not users. When I talk to other Linux users, they say >> "Fedora was great, until I found something that listened to the >> end-users much more." As a developer, I love Fedora. As a user, I >> feel like many items that are pointed out are ignored because it means >> developers have to do something. >> I am not trying to start a flame-war, but please remember, we develop >> to serve users, and they are very important. If they want/require >> zope python 2.4, we should try to accommodate them; otherwise it's a >> 3rd party repo job and will show that Fedora is also incomplete. > My feelings also. +1 from here, too > I mean if it's technically possible to package clean > compat python 2.4 packages, and we have competent community members > willing to do it, i don't understand why we shouldn't let them... Well, we need a clean break now and then, as we end with a big and unmaintainable mess with lots of compat packages otherwise. So I can understand the intention to not ship something like compat-python -- but I think it's to early for that. So my vote is to ship a compat-python24 for F7, but tell everyone that we won't do that for F8 and later. That gives developers like those from zope half a year time to prepare. I think that's only fair. Cu thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list