On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 14:34 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I find it pretty sad that FESCo is vetoing packages which don't have licensing > > (including copyright/patent/trademark) or serious security issues. If someone > > is willing to maintain such a package, why not let them? > > > > b/c of the maintenance headache it adds to the entire distribution and > all of the misfiled bugs and confusing reports it will create. Why do you assume that will happen? I would guess that most bug reports would be directed to zope.org. The presence of the 2.4 python wouldn't even be visible unless someone dug into the package startup scripts. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
