On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 18:30 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rex Dieter <rdieter <at> math.unl.edu> writes: > > FESCo discussed this awhile back (not sure when), and (pretty much) veto'd > > the compat-python option. > > I find it pretty sad that FESCo is vetoing packages which don't have licensing > (including copyright/patent/trademark) or serious security issues. If someone > is willing to maintain such a package, why not let them? > b/c of the maintenance headache it adds to the entire distribution and all of the misfiled bugs and confusing reports it will create. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
