On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 10:58 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Nigel Jones wrote: > > Sorry to come into the discussion a bit later than expected. > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> The proposal I mailed to the list yesterday is now available here: > >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml > >> What's the thinking behind removing *.mli by default? Even in packages > >> which are well documented, the *.mli files are the definitive reference > >> for programmers. I think they should always be in the -devel subpackage. > > I replaced it in ocaml-SDL and ocaml-camlimages with ocamldoc generated > > html references, which seems to be pretty much the same as the > > individual mli files. > > But I wanna use 'less'! > > Seriously, I don't want to fire up a browser just to check an interface. > Even the text mode browsers have serious UI problems compared to > 'less /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/list.mli'. > > Is there any reason why *.mli files can't be included in a -devel > package? I'm not talking about the main library package where it would > add bloat, but in a package which would only need to be installed by > developers. +1 -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
