Gérard Milmeister wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I got looking into this because of these review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815
And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml
packaging guidelines.
Interesting with regards to this are:
http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html
http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt
Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for
example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by
Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>.
Yes an ocaml sig probably is a good idea. But as said I'm only the reviewer
here, so to those interested, go ahead create a sig. Maybe Nigel Jones will
want to join you too, as he is the submitter of the package review requests
linked to above.
Either way we need to put down some guidelines, since the current ocaml
packages aren't packaged properly (when judging them by the debian / PLD
guidelines).
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
