On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 20:17 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Gérard Milmeister wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> I got looking into this because of these review requests: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 > >> > >> And I've come to the conclusion that we need some kinda ocaml > >> packaging guidelines. > >> > >> Interesting with regards to this are: > >> http://docs.pld-linux.org/ocaml.html > >> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.txt > > > > Maybe you could start an add something to the fedoraproject wiki, for > > example a Ocaml SIG. There has also been some interest in this by > > Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > Yes an ocaml sig probably is a good idea. But as said I'm only the reviewer > here, so to those interested, go ahead create a sig. Maybe Nigel Jones will > want to join you too, as he is the submitter of the package review requests > linked to above. > > Either way we need to put down some guidelines, since the current ocaml > packages aren't packaged properly (when judging them by the debian / PLD > guidelines). I can help get the guidelines approved but I'm not an OCaml packager so most of the work will be up to you guys. Discuss the guidelines, either put something under /wiki/PackagingDrafts/ or ping me with a copy that you want to propose and I'll do it. Then it would be tremendously helpful if one of you could make it to a Packaging Meeting where the Guideline gets discussed by the Packaging Committee. That way you can field questions immediately instead of me being a go-between. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
