On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 21:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Okay, > > The proposal I mailed to the list yesterday is now available here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml > Thanks Hans! I have a question about bytecode/native code. Should the guidelines specify that module packages build both bytecode and native code? As a precedent, a java library will install a native code version to %{_libdir}/libfoo-1.0.so and byte code to /usr/share/java/foo-1.0.jar. I also wonder if we want to specify that ocaml programs should be compiled to native code. > If you can let me know where and when the FPC meeting happens, then I can see > if I can attend (times in CET please, as a european I'm not used to doing > timezone calculations) > I believe that tibbs answered this. Thanks, -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
