On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:39:01PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 13:29 -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > > ...... Original Message ....... > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:25:29 -0500 Tom "spot" Callaway > > <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Not to ask stupid questions, but should that have ever worked? I'd think > > >an outright rejection would be far useful than creating empty files > > >innocently. > > > > > > > It should work because inodes and data blocks are two distinct resources > > within a filesystem that UNIX/Linux quotas have the flexibility in > > controlling separately. > > > > Behaviors (especially those with decades long precedence) shouldn't change > > without very good reason, and they certaintly shouldn't change > > non-deliberately. > > > > I wonder if POSIX has anything to say about quota behavior. > > > > Since I posted the message, I checked a SLES10 box using ext3 with acls and > > user_xattr. It's behaves as expected in the traditional manner. Being over > > your data block quota doesn't impact the ability to create zero byte files. > > This may be a legit bug then. Bugzilla it. :) It's nothing we added. Tell upstream would be a better answer. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
