On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 13:29 -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > ...... Original Message ....... > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:25:29 -0500 Tom "spot" Callaway > <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Not to ask stupid questions, but should that have ever worked? I'd think > >an outright rejection would be far useful than creating empty files > >innocently. > > > > It should work because inodes and data blocks are two distinct resources > within a filesystem that UNIX/Linux quotas have the flexibility in > controlling separately. > > Behaviors (especially those with decades long precedence) shouldn't change > without very good reason, and they certaintly shouldn't change > non-deliberately. > > I wonder if POSIX has anything to say about quota behavior. > > Since I posted the message, I checked a SLES10 box using ext3 with acls and > user_xattr. It's behaves as expected in the traditional manner. Being over > your data block quota doesn't impact the ability to create zero byte files. This may be a legit bug then. Bugzilla it. :) ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
