Re: Change of historical behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



...... Original Message .......
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:25:29 -0500 Tom "spot" Callaway 
<tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Not to ask stupid questions, but should that have ever worked? I'd think
>an outright rejection would be far useful than creating empty files
>innocently.
>

It should work because inodes and data blocks are two distinct resources 
within a filesystem that UNIX/Linux quotas have the flexibility in 
controlling separately. 

Behaviors (especially those with decades long precedence) shouldn't change 
without very good reason, and they certaintly shouldn't change 
non-deliberately.

I wonder if POSIX has anything to say about quota behavior.

Since I posted the message, I checked a SLES10 box using ext3 with acls and 
user_xattr. It's behaves as expected in the traditional manner. Being over 
your data block quota doesn't impact the ability to create zero byte files.

Empty files are not usually accidents.
___
Dax Kelson
Guru Labs

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux