Luke Macken wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 04:03:42AM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 05:29:44PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:
The current situation with updates-testing is that bug fixes tend to get
pushed straight into updates. Updates-testing gets little coverage so few
devs or testers use it. Its a vicious circle. A cursory glance show some
packages are over 5 months old.
I'm hoping that Bodhi[0] will eventually help improve updates-testing by allowing
testers to get more involved with the whole process. Once testers can
provide positive/negative feedback to the devs regarding updates, I think
that it will become much more utilized.
Also, the fact that we're going to be forcing all non-security updates
to go into updates-testing first will help as well.
Bodhi looks really interesting. What's its proper discussion forum?
In case fedora-devel is the proper forum, a question: what happens to
updates that are in updates-testing and then fail community QA? Do their
rpms get yanked from updates-testing? It seems that today, it's
difficult to yank rpms, and the updates-testing repo has junk in it.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/47277/focus=47278
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
