Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:16:09 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> I disagree, I've done it, and it works just fine. I've advocated that >> >> all alternatives-using-packages (particularly jpackage ones) use this >> >> technique. >> > Now you've got N packages which pretend they own a file/symlink. >> That's as it should be, imo. You would rather the file/symlink be >> unowned? > But sure! The link target does not belong into any package I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree then, that's ok. :) -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
