Re: rpms/ettercap/devel ettercap.spec,1.4,1.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:31:03AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> OK, I don't get it:
> [wolfy@wolfy ~]$ rpm -ql ssmtp --scripts
> postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
> /usr/sbin/alternatives  --install /usr/sbin/sendmail mta 
> /usr/sbin/sendmail.ssmtp 30 \
>    [other slave links removed]
>    [etc stuff removed from paste]
> /usr/bin/mailq.ssmtp
> /usr/bin/newaliases.ssmtp
> /usr/sbin/sendmail.ssmtp
> /usr/sbin/ssmtp
> 
> [wolfy@wolfy ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/sbin/sendmail
> sendmail-8.13.1-3.RHEL4.5.i386
> ssmtp-2.61-11.1.el4.i386
> 
> There is no %ghost here... where does the difference towards ettercap 
> come from, since I have used the same postinstall scriptlet ?

Maybe it comes from the explicit Provides:

Provides:       MTA smtpdaemon %{_sbindir}/sendmail

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux