Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 27 March 2007 16:16:59 Bernard Johnson wrote: >> Are we ok with letting CodecBuddy direct users to the Fluendo webstore? >> Are there going to be providions for equal access for other vendors? > > I personally had thought that codecbuddy was going to drive users to a > fedoraproject.org page which would give more information and list possible > vendors for the codec. If Fluendo is the only possible vendor, that's fine, > but we would own the page that codecbuddy drives to and thus own the content > listed and could add/remove vendors at our will. Is that not the case? Unfortunately, I don't think there is enough in rawhide to preview. You might be right (and your description would probably work great and be fair), but... My assumption was based on http://hadessuk.blogspot.com/2007/03/totem-news.html In this screenshot, it looks like the application is pulling the information directly from the Fluendo webshop (their description, their price). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
