On Tuesday 27 March 2007 16:16:59 Bernard Johnson wrote: > Are we ok with letting CodecBuddy direct users to the Fluendo webstore? > Are there going to be providions for equal access for other vendors? I personally had thought that codecbuddy was going to drive users to a fedoraproject.org page which would give more information and list possible vendors for the codec. If Fluendo is the only possible vendor, that's fine, but we would own the page that codecbuddy drives to and thus own the content listed and could add/remove vendors at our will. Is that not the case? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpNDWV89PnHt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
