On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:19 -0400 > wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx (Will Woods) wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > ...snipp... > > > > > Most likely a lot of 1) bugs are already solved but never got > > > > closed / retested, others should be taken upstream (and thus > > > > closed in Fedora BZ), etc. > > > > > > If a lot of 1) bugs are already solved, anyone within the > > > 'fedorabugs' group can act as a proxy to close them out. Team > > > effort would be a very good thing I think. > > > > Well then - let's start friday Bug Days again. This friday (and > > possibly next friday) we can try to work through the FC5 and FC6 test > > release bugs. It's only 380 bugs! Here's the link: > > > > http://rdr.to/W8 > > > > That's (currently) 460 ASSIGNED, MODIFIED, NEEDINFO and NEW bugs > > against all the FC5 and FC6 test releases. > > Sounds like a good idea to me. I would be happy to help. > > What time? Coordinate on #fedora-devel irc? > Is there more info for people who would like to help? Usually we do this in #fedora-qa. The following wiki pages should also be helpful: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TriagingGuidelines > > This might be a good time to mention the recently-created > > fedora-qa-list: > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-qa-list > > Another list? :( Is that really needed? or couldn't discussions take > place here? Plenty of discussions *could* take place here - in fact, 10,000 unread emails indicate that plenty of them *do* take place here - but there was nowhere to discuss QA-specific things like bug triaging and bugzilla improvements and regression testing. So yes, it is really needed. -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
