On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:19 -0400 wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx (Will Woods) wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 13:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: ...snipp... > > > Most likely a lot of 1) bugs are already solved but never got > > > closed / retested, others should be taken upstream (and thus > > > closed in Fedora BZ), etc. > > > > If a lot of 1) bugs are already solved, anyone within the > > 'fedorabugs' group can act as a proxy to close them out. Team > > effort would be a very good thing I think. > > Well then - let's start friday Bug Days again. This friday (and > possibly next friday) we can try to work through the FC5 and FC6 test > release bugs. It's only 380 bugs! Here's the link: > > http://rdr.to/W8 > > That's (currently) 460 ASSIGNED, MODIFIED, NEEDINFO and NEW bugs > against all the FC5 and FC6 test releases. Sounds like a good idea to me. I would be happy to help. What time? Coordinate on #fedora-devel irc? Is there more info for people who would like to help? > Next week: FC5, or FC6? Possibly. ;) If this is a weekly thing I would also like to see trying to help out some of the packages that just have way too many bugs for any single mantainer to deal with... rpm, kernel, etc. > This might be a good time to mention the recently-created > fedora-qa-list: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-qa-list Another list? :( Is that really needed? or couldn't discussions take place here? > Further discussion of this topic should go there. ok. I will after this I suppose. > -w kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
