Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Vrabec (pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here: >> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html >> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there >> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt. > > My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, And what do you plan to do during upgrade if there are some slots already occupied? I suggest to avoid using static UID as much as possible. > and just do static > registrations for everything - it's simpler. It can be combined with > making dynamic system IDs go from 499 down as well. > > Bill > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
