On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Peter Vrabec wrote: > >> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here: > >> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html > >> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there > >> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt. > > My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, > And what do you plan to do during upgrade if there are some slots > already occupied? The suggestion of falling back to a dynamic UID is probably best -- then those systems are no worse than before. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list