Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:43:51AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Don't you think somebody should make some decision here: >>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00124.html >>> - flame, but possible pros and cons can be find there >>> My opinion is not to use fedora-usermgmt. >> My proposal is to use 100-499 for static as well, and just do static >> registrations for everything - it's simpler. It can be combined with >> making dynamic system IDs go from 499 down as well. > > Yes. > > Further, I think we should exercise a little caution with the < 100 > assignments and only fill that space with things that have a proven track > record and are likely to be around and useful for a while. Not, say, random > games. +1. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
