Re: RPATH status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I thought there's already a whitelist. There's (W)arnings and (E)rrors.
> Just like a C compiler.

You need per-package whitelists; i.e., it's OK for this package to
have this directory as 2775, this binary as 4755, etc. Trying to
maintain those all in rpmlint itself is doomed to fail.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux