I've noticed that there are still many binaries in /usr/bin that have RPATH hardcoded in them. On a x86_64 full installation there are 470 binaries with /usr/lib64 in RPATH. That looks like a lot of work to have this fixed and maintained. Maybe a chrpath script could be used in the build process, and remove automatically the obvious cases like /usr/lib64, /usr/local/lib and @RPATH@ ? 470 /usr/lib64 47 /usr/lib64/lam 39 //usr/local/lib 20 /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE 13 /usr/lib64/mysql 12 /usr/lib64/htdig:/usr/lib64/htdig_db 7 @RPATH@ 7 /usr/lib64/openmpi 7 /usr/lib64/kde3 5 /usr/lib64:/usr/lib 4 /usr/lib64:/usr/lib64 4 /usr/lib64/fedora-ds 3 /usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2 2 /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib:/usr/lib64:/usr/lib/kde3 2 /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10 1 /usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib 1 /usr/lib64:/usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2 1 /usr/lib64:/usr/lib/gcj-4.1.2 1 /usr/lib64:/lib64 1 /usr/lib64/xfce4/modules 1 /usr/lib64/quagga 1 /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib:/usr/lib64/kde3 1 /usr/lib64/octave-2.9.9 1 /usr/lib64/kazehakase:/usr/lib64/firefox-2.0.0.2 1 /usr/lib64/gthumb 1 /usr/lib64/graphviz 1 /usr/lib64/gnucash 1 /usr/lib64/gnome-commander 1 /usr/lib64/ecl 1 /usr/lib64/dia 1 /usr/lib64/brltty -- Miroslav Lichvar -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
