On 09.03.2007 14:43, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:04:27 +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >> On a x86_64 full installation there are 470 binaries with /usr/lib64 >> in RPATH. That looks like a lot of work to have this fixed and >> maintained. Maybe a chrpath script could be used in the build process, >> and remove automatically the obvious cases like /usr/lib64, >> /usr/local/lib and @RPATH@ ? > The right way would be to file bugs against the packages, I think. The right way IMHO would be to enable the rpath checks on the buildsys, so the build fails if rpath show up that are not whitelisted in the spec file. Then way people notice the rpath and in most cases fix them; new rpath further get noticed immediately, and we all save time as we don#t have to file bugs :-) . The checks are *iirc* enabled for the Extras builders. We should make sure they get enabled for the new Fedora builders, too. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
